Annoying mall vendors have been pushing what may be one of public
health’s greatest accomplishments—and few have taken notice. Behind pillow pet
stations and the candle stand, mall shoppers can find electronic cigarettes, or
“vapes.” Often targeted at smokers wanting to quit, e-cigarettes offer many of
the joys of smoking without one of its major components: smoke.
Smokeless cigarettes have become a hot product, with an
estimated $1.7 billion in sales this year.
According to a recent article in the Journal of the American Medical
Association, over 10% of smokers have tried e-cigarettes, and almost 5% have
used them in the past month. Often marketed as smoking-cessation products, a
small Italian study suggested that smokers do smoke fewer real cigarettes when
given e-cigarettes. A 2011 study in
Addiction found that 77% of users used e-cigarettes for the purpose of smoking
cessation and that 79% of users were afraid of relapse if they stopped using
the e-cigarette. Their efficacy as a smoking cessation tool is still in
question.
But for e-cigarettes to be a successful public health
intervention, they do no not need to help smokers quit.
E-cigarettes need not be just a smoking cessation tool.
Instead, their potential comes as a smoking maintenance tool that could greatly
reduce individual and public health risks. Unlike other nicotine replacement
therapies such as the patch or gum, e-cigarettes deliver the full smoking
experience: as users put cigarettes to their lips, see a light when they
inhale, and even receive a smoke-like “throat hit.”
Studies have not yet shown that e-cigarettes are healthier
than tobacco cigarettes, since longitudinal studies of this kind are years down
the line. But e-cigarettes lack the major carcinogens in tobacco cigarettes,
which come not from nicotine but from other toxins. Most e-cigarettes use
liquid cartridges with very few ingredients: water, nicotine, flavoring, and
propylene glycol. Should these cartridges be shown to have toxic effects, they
are likely to be orders of magnitude less severe than those of traditional
tobacco cigarettes.
E-cigarettes also offer socioeconomic benefits. They can be
much cheaper than traditional cigarettes: a “5 pack” of e-cigarette cartridges
costs $10 compared to the $36 for 5 packs of tobacco cigarettes. As tobacco
smoking is more common among disadvantaged groups with lower income and wealth,
decreasing the cost of the habit could help less wealthy individuals and
families.
Greater still are the societal implications of e-cigarettes.
Widespread adoption of e-cigarettes—even without a decrease in nicotine
intake—would create more smoke-free spaces and communities, reducing the
negative health consequences of second-hand smoke. “Third-hand smoke,” a newly
coined term for carcinogen deposits on clothes and furniture, which has been
reported to be even more dangerous than second-hand smoke, could disappear
before most people hear of it.
There are still good arguments against e-cigarettes:
“secondhand vapor” of propylene glycol might still irritate others, short-term
use of e-cigarettes can increase airway resistance, nicotine increases blood
pressure, and e-cigarettes may introduce some non-smokers to an addictive
behavior they would have otherwise avoided, especially teens.
E-cigarettes could soon become harder to acquire or more
expensive, as FDA regulations this fall may ban Internet sales or otherwise
restrict their sale and marketing. But even when accepting the potential
individual health risks, electronic cigarettes have the potential to greatly
reduce one of the world’s greatest public health risks.
E-cigarettes will be a major research topic in the years
ahead. But instead of seeing them as a smoking cessation tool, we should see
their potential as a safer smoking maintenance option. Reducing individual
health risks and, more importantly, potentially eliminating the societal health
risks of second- and third-hand smoke makes you think: those annoying mall
vendors may be saving lives.
Article Credit: www.kevinmd.com
No comments:
Post a Comment